Research & data

Built on what the air actually contains

Every design decision in this system traces back to measured local air quality data — particulate counts, seasonal pollution cycles, and indoor-outdoor exchange rates specific to Southern California.

0yr

Monitoring period

Continuous outdoor sampling before design began. West Costa Mesa is a residential and industrial neighborhood with air q…

0.00%

HEPA capture rate

At 0.3 µm — the most penetrating particle size

0 CFM

Airflow rate

Sized to achieve 4–5 ACH in a 500 sq ft room

0.00″

HEPA media depth

Deeper bed = lower face velocity = longer filter life

Why local data matters

National air quality averages mask significant regional variation. A system tuned to the EPA's national PM2.5 mean will underperform in areas with wildfire smoke, coastal marine layer, or heavy traffic corridors.

This project began with two years of hyperlocal monitoring before a single filter was specified. The data shaped every component choice — carbon bed depth, HEPA grade, fan CFM, and vent placement angle.

Seasonal particulate levels — Southern California

PM2.5 (µg/m³)PM10 (µg/m³)

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Peak PM2.5: Nov–Jan (wildfire + inversion) · Peak PM10: Apr–Jun (wind / pollen)

Pollutant profile

What the local air actually contains

PM2.5

Fine particulate matter under 2.5 microns. Primary driver of HEPA specification.

68 µg/m³

Oct – Jan (wildfire + inversion)

Stage 2 — HEPA

PM10

Coarse dust, pollen, and road debris. Captured before HEPA stage.

112 µg/m³

Apr – Jun (wind / pollen)

Stage 1 — Carbon pre-filter

VOCs

Volatile organic compounds from traffic, solvents, and combustion.

0.38 ppm TVOC

Year-round (traffic corridor)

Stage 1 — Activated carbon

NO₂

Nitrogen dioxide from vehicle exhaust. Indicator of combustion proximity.

52 ppb

Nov – Feb (temperature inversion)

Stage 1 — Carbon bed

Infiltration analysis

How much outdoor pollution enters the building

Simultaneous indoor and outdoor sensors measured the fraction of each pollutant that penetrates the building envelope without active filtration. VOCs infiltrate most aggressively — nearly 85% of outdoor concentration — while coarse PM10 is partially blocked by the structure itself.

These ratios directly informed the carbon bed sizing: a deeper activated carbon stage was required to address the high VOC infiltration rate that a HEPA-only system would miss entirely.

Indoor / outdoor ratio — no active filtration

PM2.572% penetrates indoors
PM1038% penetrates indoors
VOCs85% penetrates indoors
NO₂61% penetrates indoors

Measured at test structure without active filtration.■ Indoor  ■ Outdoor baseline

Measurement methodology

How the data was collected and applied

01

Outdoor baseline sampling

Laser particle counters placed at roof level — the actual intake point — logged PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 at 5-minute intervals across all seasons.

02

Indoor-outdoor ratio analysis

Simultaneous indoor and outdoor measurements established the infiltration ratio for the test structure, revealing which pollutants penetrate most aggressively through the building envelope.

03

Filter media selection

Candidate HEPA and carbon media were bench-tested against the measured local pollutant profile — not generic lab aerosols — to confirm real-world capture efficiency.

04

CFM and ACH modeling

Room volume, infiltration rate, and target air changes per hour were used to specify fan output. 170 CFM achieves 4–5 ACH in a 500 sq ft room with 8 ft ceilings.

References

Data sources and standards

2024–2026

EPA AQS Data — South Coast AQMD

Hourly PM2.5 and PM10 readings from the nearest EPA monitoring station, used as calibration reference.

2025

CARB Wildfire Smoke Guidance

California Air Resources Board seasonal PM2.5 projections for wildfire corridors in Southern California.

2022

ASHRAE 62.2 — Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality

Standard used to derive minimum outdoor air exchange rates and ACH targets for residential spaces.

2023

NIOSH HEPA Filter Performance Study

Benchmark data for HEPA capture efficiency at 0.3 µm across varying face velocities.

Interested in the data or methodology?

I'm open to sharing raw datasets, sensor logs, and filter test results with researchers, engineers, and potential collaborators.

Get in touch
AirPure Engineer

Engineered for the air you actually breathe. Precision filtration informed by local air pollution data.

Get in touch

Interested in the project or want to collaborate?

Send an inquiry →

© 2026 AirPure Engineer. All rights reserved.

HEPA · MERV-13 · PM2.5 · VOC